Cartoon : Live on Earth or Mars?

Source : Green Life Style

I've read a letter in Jakarta Post about question whether we could change. Can we change?

I am, honestly so ashame to say "we". But I am an Indonesian and I do care to my country. We should read this letter. Even a foreigner himself is more care to Indonesia than the leaders of this country.

Letter: Can Indonesia change?

Thu, 11/19/2009 1:09 PM  |  Reader's Forum

I first came to Indonesia some 30 plus years ago as a young man and lived here for several years. Although a foreigner, I have strong personal ties to Indonesia, and I believe because of this I have a right to comment on the state of affairs within this country.

I returned to the UK and lived there for around 20 years, but about three years ago I returned to Indonesia. I had always planned to return. When I lived here all those years ago, the people were so kind, warm, and generous, and whilst I was away, I was always longing to return and experience again that feeling of belonging. Oh, how things change!

My exposure to Indonesia over the past three years is limited to mostly Bandung and Jakarta and my comments are based on these environments, plus what I have read and seen on TV. I have learned the hard way that one has to be a cynic to survive. I have been cheated, lied to, extorted and badly treated generally on so many occasions, and so regularly that it is now impossible to recall all of the experiences. I have been told so often that I am na*ve and that I am at fault for trusting in what I am told, in believing in what is promised, and of having an unrealistic mindset. However, it goes far beyond accepting being ripped off as being the norm.

The current fiasco involving the Corruption Eradication Commissions (KPK), the National Police, the AGO and the many other players, goes way beyond cheating and lying, even beyond corruption. One gets a sense that there is a free-for-all frenzy, that there are no rules, there is no conscience, and no limits to what crime or sin can be committed to reach an end goal. There is no honour, even among thieves. Nothing is too despicable, anything too evil, no suffering that can be inflicted is too extreme, and everybody is expendable. Depths of depravity go beyond any limit in an attempt to inflict a killer punch, to put down anybody that stands in the way, by any means. Have the ordinary man and woman become so infected by the people, of whom there seem so many, that will stoop to any level to get what they want, that they themselves now carry the disease? Alternatively, is it that people have been worn down and are now complacent to what goes on around them?

I understand that Indonesia has the largest economy in Southeast Asia, but how does that translate in real terms, in real benefits for the population as a whole? Looking at the capital city one has to wonder just how it makes any sense. Jakarta, possibly one of the ugliest cities in the world, is full of half-complete projects, the Transjakarta busway and the monorail to name just two.

The city is suffering from daily power cuts, due to years of poor management and lack of investment. There are worsening floods every year, which cause immense suffering, the impact of which would be reduced if there were a real desire to do something about it. It ranks as one of the most polluted cities on the planet due to the ever-increasing number of vehicles on the roads, but there is simply no viable alternative transport system for people to use.

All of the cities and rivers are no more that sewers. The roads and walkways are in an appalling condition; there are too few parks and green spaces for people to relax and enjoy their leisure; the airport, the number one entry point into the country, is just a disgrace. There is litter and garbage strewn everywhere; and to top it off, Jakarta is sinking. However, there are malls, loads of malls: Ask any Jakartan where they go for a bit of culture, and they will probably say a mall. Jakarta is a damning example of the price Indonesia pays for those who lie, cheat, and extort.

Can it change? Is this the turning point that many hope? Do those who have the power to make change actually have the will to carry it through? Or, is everybody who has the power to make change so deeply entrenched themselves, that self-preservation must take precedence? If all of the corrupt officials are gone, is there anybody left to clean up the mess? Is there anyone who has the courage, who is interested only in the nation, with no personal agenda, who can take up the challenge?

Peter Ramsey
Jakarta

Source : http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2009/11/19/letter-can-indonesia-change.html

Joke of The Year :

KAL's cartoon

Condolence for Floods in United Kingdom

I am feeling condolence for the floods in Cumbria that was happened because of the global warming and climate change crises.

I would like to praise the Police Patrols that have done a great job to rescue the people and save lives there.

There are 22 flood warnings in force across Scotland, northern England, the Midlands and Wales. And the global warming and climate change crises have made these flood warning severe for human lives. I hope we all could prevent more floods not only in United Kingdom, but also in Europe, ASEAN, developing nations, poor nations, and every country that have been victims of the global warming and climate change crises. We should make difference and innovation to prevent and solve this very important issue .

Congratulation for The First President of European Union : Sir Herman Van Rompuy

I would like to say congratulation for

 Sir Herman Van Rompuy 

as 

The First President 

&

Cathy Ashton

 as 

High Rep for Foreign Affairs

of

European Union

I am so glad to give supports and admirations for European Union to be stronger than before and be the leader for global issues such as global warming & climate change, global economy crises, millenium development goals, corruption in the world, etc.

And I hope ASEAN could be like European Union someday who has faced difficult times, a period of anxiety, uncertainty and lack of confidence to be the Greatest Regional Community in the world.

A Letter for President SBY

Climate Defenders!

From          Ardianto Panahatan Butarbutar

To                President Yudhoyono

Subject       Crack down on deforestation - not on Climate Defenders

Dear President Yudhoyono, 

Over the past few weeks - Greenpeace has been carrying out peaceful activities in Riau's Kampar Peninsula - to highlight rainforest and peatland destruction - in support of your commitment to reduce Indonesia's greenhouse gas emissions. Most of Indonesia's emissions come from deforestation, which has driven it to become the third biggest climate polluter on the planet. Yet, in spite of your commitment, the Provincial Government of Riau, with the aid of the police, are arresting and deporting our activists as well as members of the press in the area -- rather than cracking down on the destructive forest operations that are a root of the climate crisis. 

On November 16th, Indonesian police detained two Greenpeace activists from Italy and Germany and two independent journalists from India and Italy, all of whom were traveling on valid business and journalist visas. They were on their way to meet villagers of Teluk Meranti, who have been supporting Greenpeace efforts there to protect the rainforest and defend the climate. The police also forcibly removed a Belgian activist from the Greenpeace Climate Defenders Camp in Riau and took him into custody. After intensive interrogations, two of the activists and both journalists are now being deported. Eleven other people from Greenpeace were also deported at the start of the week. 

Mr. President, in the interest of the environment and human rights, I am calling upon you to stop these ongoing intimidation tactics being used against peaceful environmental activists and independent media. Furthermore, I urge you to take immediate action to halt deforestation and peatland destruction in Indonesia as a matter of utmost urgency, so that you show world leadership in the run up to the UN Copenhagen Climate Summit this December. 

Sincerely, 

Ardianto Panahatan Butarbutar

Millenium Developmet Goals : The Third Biggest Obstacle

Masalah terbesar ketiga Millenium Development Goals adalah masalah pemanasan global. Jumlah penduduk planet bumi adalah sebanyak lebih dari 6,5 Milyar Orang yang sebahagian besar hidup di negara-negara berkembang seperti India, Indonesia, negara-negara Afrika, negara-negara Timur Tengah, negara Eropa Timur, negara-negara dunia ketiga, dan negara-negara lainnya.

Dan dari semua angka global carbon footprint ternyata didapatkan negara berkembang hanya menyumbangkan 3 persen. Akan tetapi masyarakat yang kurang mampu dan miskin di negara ini yang paling merasakan dampak akibat pemanasan global ini.

Perubahan iklim akibat pemanasan global akan mengakibatkan sejumlah besar kegagalan panen sehingga mempengaruhi stok dan cadangan pangan dunia. Selain itu pemanasan global juga mempengaruhi kenaikan suhu laut dari pencairan es kutub yang dapat mempengaruhi perikanan dan hasil laut dunia, mempengaruhi cadangan air bersih dunia (air tawar yg bisa dikonsumsi) yang jumlahnya sangat terbatas, membuat penyebaran penyakit lebih mudah selain melemahkan kesehatan manusia akibat iklim yang tidak menentu, menyebabkan banjir akibat air laut yang naik, dan lain-lain.

Ancaman Bencana Iklim dalam Intensitas Besar di Indonesia

dea.org.au

Poster Perubahan Iklim dan Pemanasan Global

Artikel Terkait:

• Inilah 10 Prinsip Bijak Perempuan Selamatkan Bumi
• Perempuan Aset Penting Mencegah Pemanasan Global

KAMIS, 19 NOVEMBER 2009 | 19:48 WIB

JAKARTA, KOMPAS.com- Pakar lingkungan hidup dari Dewan Nasional Perubahan Iklim Amanda Katili mengatakan, ancaman terhadap bencana iklim di Indonesia dapat terjadi dalam intensitas yang lebih besar lagi dan secara langsung dirasakan oleh masyarakat petani, nelayan, pedesaan dan perkotaan.

Dampak yang lebih luas perubahan iklim tidak hanya merusak lingkungan, tetapi juga membahayakan kesehatan manusia, keamanan pangan, kegiatan pembangunan ekonomi, pengelolaan sumberdaya alam dan infrastruktur fisik, katanya, pada diskusi peluncuran buku State of World Population 2009, Kamis (19/11) di Jakarta..

MenurutAmanda Katili, perubahan iklim yang sedang terjadi perlu disikapi dengan memperdalam pemahaman tentang proses kejadiannya secara ilmiah, baik penyebab maupun dampaknya terhadap manusia dan lingkungan kita. Dengan pemahaman tersebut dapat direncanak an upaya penyesuaian (adaptasi) dan pencegahannya (mitigasi). Strategi yang sifatnya terintegrasi di tiap sector sangatlah diperlukan. Bukan hanya di tingkat pusat tetapi terutama di tingkat daerah, mengingat berbagai dampak maupun upaya akan terjadi di tingkat daerah.

Sementara Zahidul Huque dari UNFPA , mengatakan negara berkembang hanya menyumbang tiga persen dari carbon footprint global, namun mereka yang paling rentan dan sudah menanggung beban dan efek dari perubahan iklim.

Iklim yang sulit diprediksi mempengaruhi produksi pangan, menghangatkan suhu laut mempengaruhi hasil perikanan, mengurangi akses terhadap air bersih. Juga meningkatkan penyebaran dan kematian karena malaria dan kasus demam berdarah, serta penyakit lain yang disebabkan oleh kekeringan dan banjir, katanya.

Pada bagian lain juga di jelaskan, bahwa sekitar 50 persen dari 240 juta penduduk Indonesia hidup dengan kurang dari 2 dollar AS per hari, sehingga sulit bagi mereka untuk melindungi diri dari dampak iklim yang berubah: peningkatan harga pangan, berkurangnya akses air bersih, layanan kesehatan ketika sakit, dan sebagainya

NAL

Editor: msh

Sumber: http://sains.kompas.com/read/xml/2009/11/19/19484668/Ancaman.Bencana.Iklim.dalam.Intensitas.Besar.di.Indonesia..

Millenium Developmet Goals : The Second Biggest Obstacle

Batu raksasa terbesar kedua yang menghalangi segala Program Millenium Development Goals dapat digambarkan dalam presentasi berikut :

CORRUPTION HAS BEEN THREAT FOR ALL COUNTRY IN THE WORLD

Selama ini perkembangan ilmu pengetahuan dan teknologi berkembang dengan sangat pesat khususnya selama kurun waktu 20 tahun terakhir dimana perkembangan Teknologi Informasi membawa perubahan yang luar biasa di dalam kehidupan umat manusia. Dimanapun manusia berada teknologi selalu ada di samping kegiatan manusia tersebut.

Namun hal ini tidak diimbangi oleh pembangunan mental dan moral manusia itu sendiri. Pendidikan moral dan mental manusia khususnya dalam pendidikan anti korupsi, kolusi dan nepotisme berkembang dengan sangat lambat dan tertinggal jauh di belakang. Serlama ini pembangunan jauh tidak seimbang dengan menekankan pembangunan di luar diri manusia tanpa memperhatikan pembangunan mental dan moral di dalam diri manusia itu sendiri. Hal ini terlihat jelas dengan sangat buruknya potret mental dan moral yang anti korupsi di dalam tatanan global dunia yang diperlihatkan oleh data-data korupsi di seluruh dunia yang lebih dari setengahnya masih dibawah angka 5 (skala 10).

Pencapaian Millenium Development Goals yang bertujuan untuk mengurangi lebih dari separuh orang-orang yang menderita akibat kelaparan, menjamin semua anak untuk menyelesaikan pendidikan dasarnya, mengentaskan kesenjangan jender pada semua tingkat pendidikan, mengurangi kematian anak balita hingga 2/3 , dan mengurangi hingga separuh jumlah orang yang tidak memiliki akses air bersih pada tahun 2015 - sangat ditentukan oleh seberapa bersih dan seberapa kuat mental dan moral penduduk global dalam bekerja dalam masyarakat dan negaranya masing-masing.

Sangatlah sulit mencapai tingkat standar yang diharapkan terhadap berkurangnya penduduk miskin, tercapainya tingkat karbon yang minim sesuai target konferensi iklim di dalam Protokol Kyoto, berkurangnya orang kelaparan di seluruh dunia, bertambah banyaknya jumlah lapangan pekerjaan, meningkatnya taraf kesehatan ibu dan anak, semakin banyaknya orang yang bisa menikmati air bersih dan sejumlah banyak target global lainnya apabila Tingkat Korupsi, Kolusi dan Nepotisme secara global tidak dikurangi dengan signifikan.

Tantangan terbesar kedua dalam Pembangunan Masyarakat Global yang berkelanjutan sangat ditentukan oleh pembangunan mental dan moral masyarakat yang anti terhadap korupsi, kolusi dan nepotisme yang berkelanjutan yang konsekuen di seluruh dunia.

Oleh karena itu sudah selayaknya untuk mendukung target-targe Pembangunan Global melalui MDG, Konferensi Perbaikan Ikllim, dan sejumlah pembangunan global lainnya maka Kurikulum Anti Korupsi, Kolusi dan Nepotisme dimasukkan ke dalam pendidikan sekolah dari sekolah dasar hinga pendidikan tinggi secara berkesinambungan selama puluhan tahun ke depan di dalam tatanan global. Sehingga hal ini sangat diharapkan dapat mengikis krisis korupsi dengan pembangunan mental dan moral individu yang antikorupsi. Karena korupsi sudah menjadi momok dan kanker yang akut bagi Pembangunan Masyarakat Global secara berkesinambungan dan konsekuen.

 

Pencapaian mental dan moral masyarakat global yang anti terhadap Korupsi, Kolusi dan Nepotisme diharapkan dapat mengurangi penderitaan bangsa-bangsa di dunia dalam kemiskinan yang meraja lela, kelaparan umat manunua, meningkatnya jumlah buta huruf, mengurangi penduduk dunia yang tidak mempunyai rumah, berkurangnya fasilitas umum global yang mudah rusak dan sejumlah pembangunan global lainnya.

Secara singkat, dalam mendukung Millenium Development Goals saya menganjurkan agar United Nations (Persatuan Bangsa-Bangsa) perlu memberlakukan suatu perjanjian internasional yang mengikat anggotanya dalam menerapkan pendidikan anti korupsi, kolusi dan nepotisme ke dalam kurikulum pendidikan setiap negara secara berkesinambungan dan konsekuen selama puluhan tahun ke depan. Niscaya hal ini akan dapat membentuk mental masyarakat global menjadi resistan terhadap krisis mental korupsi dan dapat menciptakan suatu tatanan global yang baik guna terwujudnya tujuan-tujuang yang ada dalam Millenium Development Goals.   

Corruption threatens global economic recovery, greatly challenges countries in conflict

Berlin, 17 November 2009

As the world economy begins to register a tentative recovery and some nations continue to wrestle with ongoing conflict and insecurity, it is clear that no region of the world is immune to the perils of corruption, according to Transparency International’s 2009 Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI), a measure of domestic, public sector corruption released today.

“At a time when massive stimulus packages, fast-track disbursements of public funds and attempts to secure peace are being implemented around the world, it is essential to identify where corruption blocks good governance and accountability, in order to break its corrosive cycle” said Huguette Labelle, Chair of Transparency International (TI).

The vast majority of the 180 countries included in the 2009 index score below five on a scale from 0 (perceived to be highly corrupt) to 10 (perceived to have low levels of corruption). The CPI measures the perceived levels of public sector corruption in a given country and is a composite index, drawing on 13 different expert and business surveys. The 2009 edition scores 180 countries, the same number as the 2008 CPI.

Fragile, unstable states that are scarred by war and ongoing conflict linger at the bottom of the index. These are: Somalia, with a score of 1.1, Afghanistan at 1.3, Myanmar at 1.4 and Sudan tied with Iraq at 1.5. These results demonstrate that countries which are perceived as the most corrupt are also those plagued by long-standing conflicts, which have torn apart their governance infrastructure.

When essential institutions are weak or non-existent, corruption spirals out of control and the plundering of public resources feeds insecurity and impunity. Corruption also makes normal a seeping loss of trust in the very institutions and nascent governments charged with ensuring survival and stability.

Countries at the bottom of the index cannot be shut out from development efforts. Instead, what the index points to is the need to strengthen their institutions. Investors and donors should be equally vigilant of their operations and as accountable for their own actions as they are in demanding transparency and accountability from beneficiary countries.

“Stemming corruption requires strong oversight by parliaments, a well performing judiciary, independent and properly resourced audit and anti-corruption agencies, vigorous law enforcement, transparency in public budgets, revenue and aid flows, as well as space for independent media and a vibrant civil society,” said Labelle. “The international community must find efficient ways to help war-torn countries to develop and sustain their own institutions.”

Highest scorers in the 2009 CPI are New Zealand at 9.4, Denmark at 9.3, Singapore and Sweden tied at 9.2 and Switzerland at 9.0. These scores reflect political stability, long-established conflict of interest regulations and solid, functioning public institutions.

Overall results in the 2009 index are of great concern because corruption continues to lurk where opacity rules, where institutions still need strengthening and where governments have not implemented anti-corruption legal frameworks.

Even industrialised countries cannot be complacent: the supply of bribery and the facilitation of corruption often involve businesses based in their countries. Financial secrecy jurisdictions, linked to many countries that top the CPI, severely undermine efforts to tackle corruption and recover stolen assets.

“Corrupt money must not find safe haven. It is time to put an end to excuses,” said Labelle. “The OECD’s work in this area is welcome, but there must be more bilateral treaties on information exchange to fully end the secrecy regime. At the same time, companies must cease operating in renegade financial centres.”

Bribery, cartels and other corrupt practices undermine competition and contribute to massive loss of resources for development in all countries, especially the poorest ones. Between 1990 and 2005, more than 283 private international cartels were exposed that cost consumers around the world an estimated US $300 billion in overcharges, as documented in a recent TI report.

With the vast majority of countries in the 2009 index scoring below five, the corruption challenge is undeniable. The Group of 20 has made strong commitments to ensure that integrity and transparency form the cornerstone of a newfound regulatory structure. As the G20 tackles financial sector and economic reforms, it is critical to address corruption as a substantial threat to a sustainable economic future. The G20 must also remain committed to gaining public support for essential reforms by making institutions such as the Financial Stability Board and decisions about investments in infrastructure, transparent and open to civil society input.

Globally and nationally, institutions of oversight and legal frameworks that are actually enforced, coupled with smarter, more effective regulation, will ensure lower levels of corruption. This will lead to a much needed increase of trust in public institutions, sustained economic growth and more effective development assistance. Most importantly, it will alleviate the enormous scale of human suffering in the countries that perform most poorly in the Corruption Perceptions Index.

Source : http://www.transparency.org/news_room/latest_news/press_releases/2009/2009_11_17_cpi2009_en

Rank	Country/Territory	CPI 2009 Score	Surveys Used	Confidence Range
1	New Zealand	9.4	6	9.1 - 9.5
2	Denmark	9.3	6	9.1 - 9.5
3	Singapore	9.2	9	9.0 - 9.4
3	Sweden	9.2	6	9.0 - 9.3
5	Switzerland	9.0	6	8.9 - 9.1
6	Finland	8.9	6	8.4 - 9.4
6	Netherlands	8.9	6	8.7 - 9.0
8	Australia	8.7	8	8.3 - 9.0
8	Canada	8.7	6	8.5 - 9.0
8	Iceland	8.7	4	7.5 - 9.4
11	Norway	8.6	6	8.2 - 9.1
12	Hong Kong	8.2	8	7.9 - 8.5
12	Luxembourg	8.2	6	7.6 - 8.8
14	Germany	8.0	6	7.7 - 8.3
14	Ireland	8.0	6	7.8 - 8.4
16	Austria	7.9	6	7.4 - 8.3
17	Japan	7.7	8	7.4 - 8.0
17	United Kingdom	7.7	6	7.3 - 8.2
19	United States	7.5	8	6.9 - 8.0
20	Barbados	7.4	4	6.6 - 8.2
21	Belgium	7.1	6	6.9 - 7.3
22	Qatar	7.0	6	5.8 - 8.1
22	Saint Lucia	7.0	3	6.7 - 7.5
24	France	6.9	6	6.5 - 7.3
25	Chile	6.7	7	6.5 - 6.9
25	Uruguay	6.7	5	6.4 - 7.1
27	Cyprus	6.6	4	6.1 - 7.1
27	Estonia	6.6	8	6.1 - 6.9
27	Slovenia	6.6	8	6.3 - 6.9
30	United Arab Emirates	6.5	5	5.5 - 7.5
31	Saint Vincent and the Grenadines	6.4	3	4.9 - 7.5
32	Israel	6.1	6	5.4 - 6.7
32	Spain	6.1	6	5.5 - 6.6
34	Dominica	5.9	3	4.9 - 6.7
35	Portugal	5.8	6	5.5 - 6.2
35	Puerto Rico	5.8	4	5.2 - 6.3
37	Botswana	5.6	6	5.1 - 6.3
37	Taiwan	5.6	9	5.4 - 5.9
39	Brunei Darussalam	5.5	4	4.7 - 6.4
39	Oman	5.5	5	4.4 - 6.5
39	Korea (South)	5.5	9	5.3 - 5.7
42	Mauritius	5.4	6	5.0 - 5.9
43	Costa Rica	5.3	5	4.7 - 5.9
43	Macau	5.3	3	3.3 - 6.9
45	Malta	5.2	4	4.0 - 6.2
46	Bahrain	5.1	5	4.2 - 5.8
46	Cape Verde	5.1	3	3.3 - 7.0
46	Hungary	5.1	8	4.6 - 5.7
49	Bhutan	5.0	4	4.3 - 5.6
49	Jordan	5.0	7	3.9 - 6.1
49	Poland	5.0	8	4.5 - 5.5
52	Czech Republic	4.9	8	4.3 - 5.6
52	Lithuania	4.9	8	4.4 - 5.4
54	Seychelles	4.8	3	3.0 - 6.7
55	South Africa	4.7	8	4.3 - 4.9
56	Latvia	4.5	6	4.1 - 4.9
56	Malaysia	4.5	9	4.0 - 5.1
56	Namibia	4.5	6	3.9 - 5.1
56	Samoa	4.5	3	3.3 - 5.3
56	Slovakia	4.5	8	4.1 - 4.9
61	Cuba	4.4	3	3.5 - 5.1
61	Turkey	4.4	7	3.9 - 4.9
63	Italy	4.3	6	3.8 - 4.9
63	Saudi Arabia	4.3	5	3.1 - 5.3
65	Tunisia	4.2	6	3.0 - 5.5
66	Croatia	4.1	8	3.7 - 4.5
66	Georgia	4.1	7	3.4 - 4.7
66	Kuwait	4.1	5	3.2 - 5.1
69	Ghana	3.9	7	3.2 - 4.6
69	Montenegro	3.9	5	3.5 - 4.4
71	Bulgaria	3.8	8	3.2 - 4.5
71	FYR Macedonia	3.8	6	3.4 - 4.2
71	Greece	3.8	6	3.2 - 4.3
71	Romania	3.8	8	3.2 - 4.3
75	Brazil	3.7	7	3.3 - 4.3
75	Colombia	3.7	7	3.1 - 4.3
75	Peru	3.7	7	3.4 - 4.1
75	Suriname	3.7	3	3.0 - 4.7
79	Burkina Faso	3.6	7	2.8 - 4.4
79	China	3.6	9	3.0 - 4.2
79	Swaziland	3.6	3	3.0 - 4.7
79	Trinidad and Tobago	3.6	4	3.0 - 4.3
83	Serbia	3.5	6	3.3 - 3.9
84	El Salvador	3.4	5	3.0 - 3.8
84	Guatemala	3.4	5	3.0 - 3.9
84	India	3.4	10	3.2 - 3.6
84	Panama	3.4	5	3.1 - 3.7
84	Thailand	3.4	9	3.0 - 3.8
89	Lesotho	3.3	6	2.8 - 3.8
89	Malawi	3.3	7	2.7 - 3.9
89	Mexico	3.3	7	3.2 - 3.5
89	Moldova	3.3	6	2.7 - 4.0
89	Morocco	3.3	6	2.8 - 3.9
89	Rwanda	3.3	4	2.9 - 3.7
95	Albania	3.2	6	3.0 - 3.3
95	Vanuatu	3.2	3	2.3 - 4.7
97	Liberia	3.1	3	1.9 - 3.8
97	Sri Lanka	3.1	7	2.8 - 3.4
99	Bosnia and Herzegovina	3.0	7	2.6 - 3.4
99	Dominican Republic	3.0	5	2.9 - 3.2
99	Jamaica	3.0	5	2.8 - 3.3
99	Madagascar	3.0	7	2.8 - 3.2
99	Senegal	3.0	7	2.5 - 3.6
99	Tonga	3.0	3	2.6 - 3.3
99	Zambia	3.0	7	2.8 - 3.2
106	Argentina	2.9	7	2.6 - 3.1
106	Benin	2.9	6	2.3 - 3.4
106	Gabon	2.9	3	2.6 - 3.1
106	Gambia	2.9	5	1.6 - 4.0
106	Niger	2.9	5	2.7 - 3.0
111	Algeria	2.8	6	2.5 - 3.1
111	Djibouti	2.8	4	2.3 - 3.2
111	Egypt	2.8	6	2.6 - 3.1
111	Indonesia	2.8	9	2.4 - 3.2
111	Kiribati	2.8	3	2.3 - 3.3
111	Mali	2.8	6	2.4 - 3.2
111	Sao Tome and Principe	2.8	3	2.4 - 3.3
111	Solomon Islands	2.8	3	2.3 - 3.3
111	Togo	2.8	5	1.9 - 3.9
120	Armenia	2.7	7	2.6 - 2.8
120	Bolivia	2.7	6	2.4 - 3.1
120	Ethiopia	2.7	7	2.4 - 2.9
120	Kazakhstan	2.7	7	2.1 - 3.3
120	Mongolia	2.7	7	2.4 - 3.0
120	Vietnam	2.7	9	2.4 - 3.1
126	Eritrea	2.6	4	1.6 - 3.8
126	Guyana	2.6	4	2.5 - 2.7
126	Syria	2.6	5	2.2 - 2.9
126	Tanzania	2.6	7	2.4 - 2.9
130	Honduras	2.5	6	2.2 - 2.8
130	Lebanon	2.5	3	1.9 - 3.1
130	Libya	2.5	6	2.2 - 2.8
130	Maldives	2.5	4	1.8 - 3.2
130	Mauritania	2.5	7	2.0 - 3.3
130	Mozambique	2.5	7	2.3 - 2.8
130	Nicaragua	2.5	6	2.3 - 2.7
130	Nigeria	2.5	7	2.2 - 2.7
130	Uganda	2.5	7	2.1 - 2.8
139	Bangladesh	2.4	7	2.0 - 2.8
139	Belarus	2.4	4	2.0 - 2.8
139	Pakistan	2.4	7	2.1 - 2.7
139	Philippines	2.4	9	2.1 - 2.7
143	Azerbaijan	2.3	7	2.0 - 2.6
143	Comoros	2.3	3	1.6 - 3.3
143	Nepal	2.3	6	2.0 - 2.6
146	Cameroon	2.2	7	1.9 - 2.6
146	Ecuador	2.2	5	2.0 - 2.5
146	Kenya	2.2	7	1.9 - 2.5
146	Russia	2.2	8	1.9 - 2.4
146	Sierra Leone	2.2	5	1.9 - 2.4
146	Timor-Leste	2.2	5	1.8 - 2.6
146	Ukraine	2.2	8	2.0 - 2.6
146	Zimbabwe	2.2	7	1.7 - 2.8
154	Côte d´Ivoire	2.1	7	1.8 - 2.4
154	Papua New Guinea	2.1	5	1.7 - 2.5
154	Paraguay	2.1	5	1.7 - 2.5
154	Yemen	2.1	4	1.6 - 2.5
158	Cambodia	2.0	8	1.8 - 2.2
158	Central African Republic	2.0	4	1.9 - 2.2
158	Laos	2.0	4	1.6 - 2.6
158	Tajikistan	2.0	8	1.6 - 2.5
162	Angola	1.9	5	1.8 - 1.9
162	Congo Brazzaville	1.9	5	1.6 - 2.1
162	Democratic Republic of Congo	1.9	5	1.7 - 2.1
162	Guinea-Bissau	1.9	3	1.8 - 2.0
162	Kyrgyzstan	1.9	7	1.8 - 2.1
162	Venezuela	1.9	7	1.8 - 2.0
168	Burundi	1.8	6	1.6 - 2.0
168	Equatorial Guinea	1.8	3	1.6 - 1.9
168	Guinea	1.8	5	1.7 - 1.8
168	Haiti	1.8	3	1.4 - 2.3
168	Iran	1.8	3	1.7 - 1.9
168	Turkmenistan	1.8	4	1.7 - 1.9
174	Uzbekistan	1.7	6	1.5 - 1.8
175	Chad	1.6	6	1.5 - 1.7
176	Iraq	1.5	3	1.2 - 1.8
176	Sudan	1.5	5	1.4 - 1.7
178	Myanmar	1.4	3	0.9 - 1.8
179	Afghanistan	1.3	4	1.0 - 1.5
180	Somalia	1.1	3	0.9 - 1.4